Something about the kinesthetic learning profile also resonated with me deeply. I can recall my Social Studies course in 8th grade (nearly 20 years ago, oy vey...), which was primary structured around a year-long participatory simulation "game," as such, where the class group founded and ran a country analogous to the early United States. The class set up a government, economy (printing currency and setting up a stock exchange), and social institutions. Several times a week, the entire class period was dedicated to the "game," and we would perform legislative duties, economic transactions, and other activities that mirrored a particular time period in the early American Republic.
I am very keen on History as a subject, but American history is my least favorite sub-genre. However, I can say without a doubt that the topics covered in that class were concretely etched into my memory, even now, because of this year-long kinesthetic style project.
This leads me to believe that learning styles are not nearly as clear cut as the rudimentary three-tier Visual/Auditory/Kinesthetic model, nor even the 16 profiles contained in the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator model (where I typed as ESTJ). Our learning styles are a heterogeneous blend of traits that could primarily be labeled in such a way, but in reality they are much more nuanced than these models allow.
No comments:
Post a Comment